The Civil War and the American conquest of the West were two of the most important events that changed the United States in the nineteenth century; however, they are often treated and taught separately in history texts and classrooms. This separate categorization is hardly surprising since, in terms of geography, the majority of the Civil War took place in the southern and border states, with little military engagement in the trans-Mississippi West that occupies the focus of most western history specialists. But is also odd, given the importance of the West to American politics and identity in the decades leading up to 1861. The expansion of slavery figured prominently in the power struggles for control over western territory in the first half of the nineteenth century; determining the free or slave status of incoming states and federal territorial possessions was central of the Missouri Compromise (1832) and the Compromise of 1850, the two biggest political bargains that diffused the nations heated slavery debates in the antebellum period. Westerners also witnessed these political struggles produce outright violence, including the Bloody Kansas border war (1854 1861), before war turned national. Despite the close relationship between the West and the slavery politics that produced the Civil War, once historians reach the secession crisis, which began in the wake of Abraham Lincolns 1860 election, the West disappears from the main historical narrative.
New Scholarship on the Civil War and the West
Historians have recently begun a renewed effort to explicitly articulate the ways in which we might think about the Civil War and the West together, building on an earlier literature that limited the Civil War in the Far West to histories of military conflict, particularly the New Mexico Campaign (1862) and the Battle of Glorieta Pass. Anthologies like the University of California Presss Civil War Wests demonstrate the sheer diversity of scholarship a Civil War West framework can produce and join together. These collections of essays also illuminate broader themes that can help us think about East and West together how the Civil War period raised questions about the nature and form of citizenship, witnessed many kinds of violent conflict on and off formal battlefields, and set in motion military, economic, and political events that continued well after the war officially ended. Histories that explore these themes are helping to reorient the major narratives of not only the Civil War, but will also expand our conceptions of Reconstruction practices and policies, revealing the national scope and impact of the Civil War and its consequences, as well as the periods international significance.
Suggested Reading: Civil War West
- Ward M. McAfee, Californias House Divided, Civil War History33:2 (1987), pg. 115-130
- Adam Arenson and Andrew R. Graybill, eds., Civil War Wests: Testing the Limits of the United States (Oakland, University of California Press, 2015).
- Virginia Scharff, ed., Empire and Liberty: The Civil War and the West (Oakland, University of California Press, 2015).
* If you are near Autry National Center of the American West in Los Angeles, CA, check out their complimentary museum exhibition, Empire and Liberty, which explores the causes and legacies of the American Civil War from the vantage point of Westward expansion, on view until January 3, 2016.
The Civil War West in the Classroom
Bringing the Civil War West into the classroom can be approached from a number of directions, to which the wide-ranging variety of recent scholarship attests. Prompting students think about the Civil War and western expansion together not only introduces them a current and growing subject of historical inquiry, but also helps them appreciate the truly national impact of the war. Adding the Far West into a Civil War narrative, however, should not merely take the form of extra-curricular add-ons; as historians have warned, brief excursions into less traversed territory do not really disrupted or reroute what have long been the main thoroughfares of study and writing. In keeping with the purpose and spirit of the new scholarship that combines the West and the Civil War, teachers will be best served by purposefully integrating western perspectives and sources into the larger narratives of the desired curriculum where possible.
- Letter from U.S. Army Brigadier-General E. V. Sumner to Hon. Simon Cameron (Sept. 27, 1861), The War of the Rebellion: Official Records Series I, Vol L, Part 1, pp. 635-641
- 1861, Mar. 16. Arizona Ordinance of Secession in Ordinances of Secession and Other Documents, 1860 861, ed. Albert Bushnell Hard and Edward Channing (Ebook: American History Leaflet: Colonial and Constitutional No. 12, 2011)
- Proposed map of division of the Arizona and New Mexico Territories by the Confederacy during the Civil War, Arizona Historical Society.
- Asbury Harpending, The great diamond hoax and other stirring incidents in the life of Asbury Harpending (1913)
Dreams of Empire
Among the ways western Civil War sources expand our views of the conflict, they offer important insights into the Confederate perspective and worldview, revealing the scope and nature of the Confederacys dreams for its future beyond the defeat of Union forces. With origins in various efforts to expand their proslavery order throughout the Atlantic in the 1850s, Confederates envisioned and attempted to create a transcontinental empire throughout the Southwest throughout the war.
Suggested Reading: Proslavery Expansionism
- Matthew Karp, The World Slaveholders Craved: Proslavery Internationalism in the 1850s in The World of the Revolutionary American Republic: Land Labor and the Conflict for a Continent, ed. Andrew Shankman (New York: Routledge, 2014), 414 432.
- Walter Johnson, River of Dark Dreams: Slavery and Empire in the Cotton Kingdom (Boston, Belknap Press, 2013). Chapters 11 13 in particular form the books study of proslavery imperialism.
- Leonard L. Richards, The California Gold Rush and the Coming of the Civil War (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2007). Chapter 8 and the Epilogue are particularly relevant.
- Kevin Waite, Californias Forgotten Proslavery Past, History News Network, July 6, 2014.
- David Blight, A Southern World View: The Old South and Proslavery Ideology Lecture, YaleCourses – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yRfByLRO5xs
In a letter to Secretary of War and former Senator from Pennsylvania, Simon Cameron, Brigadier-General Edwin Sumner described the Confederacys plans for the Far West in 1861:
The machinations of secession forces who are now straining every nerve, using every device, pulling every cord with might and main to circumvent the supports of our glorious Union, and incorporating the States of Nuevo Leon, Coahuila, Chihuahua, Durango, and Sonora, Mexico into the Government of the Confederate States of the South. For this purpose Jeff. Davis, the rebel chief, has dispatched secret agents to the governors of the States above enumerated to induce them to secede and joining the standard of the seceshers.
General Sumner believed more loyal and competent men should replace the governors of New Mexico Territory and Arizona, territory the restless eye of Jeff. Davis [was] particularly bent on, as they were doing little to stymie Confederate schemes for the demolition of a free Republic and the erection in its stead of a military slavery, extending empire. Sumners letter not only describes the importance of the Far West for Union military planning, but also the Confederacys fight for Arizona territory in terms of its international vision of a proslavery republic.
Arizona Territory was not just the passive subject of Confederate imperialists designs. In March 1861, residents passed an ordinance of secession by convention after federal forces withdrew from the territory. Although only a Confederate possession for a brief period of time (ending July 1862), the Ordinance reveals the pressing concerns of the people of Arizona Territory: the need for protection from Indian raids and attacks, continued mail service, and the ties of southern identity. Interestingly, the document makes no explicit mention of slavery. Have students compare the Arizona Territorys Ordinance of Secession with another states declaration of secession (South Carolinas Declaration of the Immediate Causes which Induce and Justify Secession is a prime example). What are the concerns articulated in each document? Where do they overlap or diverge? What does each document tell us about the pressing realities of life in each place?
Confederate Plans for California
California also experienced the push-and-pull of proslavery and free labor forces in the mid-nineteenth century. The California Gold Rush brought the free or slave labor question to the fore. While miners wanted to prevent the competition slave labor posed, southerners had different ideas; Jefferson Davis argued African slaves were better adapted to working in the mines of California than the European races. Even after California joined the Union as a free state in 1850, proslavery advocates did not give up their plans to join California with the South. In 1861, once the Civil War began, a number of secessionist plots arose, including the effort to found a Pacific Republic with Oregon, allied with the Confederacy.
Asbury Harpendings lively biography, The Great Diamond Hoax and Other Stirring Episodes in the Life of Asbury Harpending, provides a first-hand account of southern sympathizers conspiratorial efforts to create the Pacific Republic, as well as Harpendings brief stint as a Confederate privateer in the San Francisco Bay, attempting to raid Union cargo ships. A Kentuckian by birth, Harpending ran away as a teen to join s proslavery filibustering mission to Nicaragua in 1854. Caught by federal authorities before leaving the United States, Harpending traveled to California instead. Involved in a number of confederate conspiracies designed to join California with the secessionist South, as well as a part-time pirate, Harpending himself declared, It would have been hard to find a more reckless secessionist. Harpendings narrative, an entertaining read on its own, helps students connect the expansionist proslavery projects of the 1850s with secessionist efforts in the West, while the variety of conspiracies Harpending participated in attest to the importance of California to secessionist visionaries.
The Impact of a Western Approach to the Civil War
Approaching the Civil War from the West offers fresh and relevant ways to think about the most important event in nineteenth century America. Teachers can build in western history to their Civil War units on a number of thematic orientations: slavery expansionism, southern imperialism, American continental empire, the role of regionalism, and the meaning of citizenship in the nineteenth century. But we need not bring the two estimable subjects into the classroom simply as a side-note. As historians seek to reorient the traditional Civil War narrative, teachers at all levels can play their part by integrating western sources into their Civil War curriculum and to help their students think about the conflicts international reach and national impact.
Extra Activity: The Civil War and the Far West on the International Stage
In 1863, William McKendree Gwin, a doctor and one of Californias first senators, as well as a proslavery advocate, travelled to France to gain Napoleon IIIs support for a settlement project in Sonora, Mexico designed to attract pro-Confederacy Californians and launch a Mexican gold rush. In 1865, General Ulysses S. Grant and Major-General Irvine McDowell, commander of the Department of the Pacific, wrote one another discussing the threat Gwin posed to the preservation of the United States. Using the linked primary sources below, students can review Grant and McDowells correspondence and assessment of the situation. Paired with Kevin Waites article on Gwins Sonora settlement scheme, students can see how historians mobilize primary sources to craft historical narratives, gaining an understanding of another chapter of the history of the Civil War in the West, as well as the craft of historical writing.
- Letter from U.S. Grant, Lieutenant-General to Major General I. McDowell (January 8, 1865), The War of the Rebellion: Official Records Series I, Vol L, Part 2, pp. 1118
- Reply, letter from Irvine McDowell, Major-General to Lient. Gen. U.S. Grant (March 12, 865) The War of the Rebellion: Official Records Series I, Vol L, Part 2, pp. 1158 – 1160
- Kevin Waite, A California Rebel in Napoleons Court, Were History, January 12, 2015